2024 was a momentous year for the ballot: over 2 billion people voted for political leaders in forty countries, in an unprecedented number of elections in a single year.
To reflect this record-breaking year of voting, the Global Parliament Index seeks to analyse what this new political map of the world means for us all. And it should worry everyone who supports democracy.
In a first of its kind study, the index analyses the political leanings of each government and places countries into one of ten categories based upon multiple factors; including the governing party’s policies, manifestos, and record in power.
Our Global Parliament Index shows that most people living in Europe and North America are dominated by centre-right governments. And while each geographical region contains a mix of political hues; left-wing governments are more common in Latin America; and right-wing governments more common in Europe. If each government represented a seat in a global parliament:
This world map shows the government type in each of the world’s countries and the political alignment of its democracies on a scale from Populist Left through to Populist Right.
The study reflects the balance of political power across all governments aggregated into a single 1,000-member Global Parliament Index, with each MP representing about five million people. Where countries have smaller populations than the minimum number required per seat, they have been combined with other smaller countries that have the same government category.
Navigate through where the world sits across the political spectrum by region using the arrows below. Vote shares can be viewed here.
Navigate through where the world’s democracies sit across the political spectrum by region using the arrows below. Vote shares can be viewed here.
At Arden we appreciate the vastly diverse political ideologies that exist across different countries. Defining how to classify political positions on a spectrum is an impractical task, particularly in an increasingly fragmented and polarised atmosphere. But with each significant national election there’s a golden opportunity to capture insight into the political state of the world at large.
In 2024, over 2 billion people across 40 countries, representing approximately 50% of the global GDP, had the chance to elect a new leader. Electoral results saw significant political shifts and a trend of anti-incumbency. Voter frustration with economic and political issues led to major changes in leadership in several countries, highlighting a global desire for new directions and governance.
The elections highlighted a common theme: declining support for incumbent leaders. Economic struggles like inflation and the rising cost of living played a major role in voter dissatisfaction, leading to significant political shifts worldwide. Many ruling parties either lost power or saw their majorities dramatically reduced.
The resulting ideological landscape is mixed. Countries like the United States, Portugal, and Panama have experienced a shift to the right. In contrast, South Korea and the United Kingdom have leaned towards the left. A particularly striking case is France, where snap elections led to a fractured parliament. In this scenario, the left and centre worked together to keep the far-right out of power, resulting in no single party securing a majority; highlighting deep political divisions.
Meanwhile, there is growing concern about the rise of far-right parties. Notable examples include Reform in the UK, the Freedom Party in Austria, National Rally in France, Chega in Portugal, Alternative for Germany, and Romanian presidential candidate Călin Georgescu. Beyond the ebb and flow of far-right movements in Europe, the key takeaway from last year’s elections is that far-right sentiments are now deeply rooted – changing the face of European politics.
Freedom and fairness in elections have varied by region. Countries like Botswana and Senegal saw peaceful transitions of power, which strengthened their democracies. By contrast, elections in India and South Africa signalled resistance to democratic erosion, but did not mark a complete reversal of previous trends.
Ultimately, people’s voting patterns underscore a global desire for change, but the electoral outcomes have been far from uniform. Economic anxiety, political polarisation, and shifting ideological currents have reshaped governments worldwide, leaving uncertain prospects for democracy’s future.
Spin the globe and zoom in to explore each country’s government type. Bubbles are sized by population.
Arden’s Global Parliament Index is a tool which provides a comprehensive and dynamic approach to understanding political landscapes. Developed by our Global Services team of experts, this tool not only equips political professionals with insight into major political shifts, but also analyses these trends to reflect on how they are impacting policy today.
At its core, the Global Parliament Index is an innovative, qualitative data-driven platform that aggregates and analyses an extensive array of political and demographic data points. The index allows users to explore and interpret political data with ease, transforming raw information into actionable intelligence.
To find out more click here.
The Arden team has advised almost thirty Presidents and Prime Ministers globally, and candidates on every continent have benefited from our support.
We offer the full spectrum of election campaign services incorporating outstanding traditional campaign support alongside innovative digital communication and engagement strategies.
In a world increasingly shaped by changing technology and greater geopolitical competition, our team are also experts and pre-empting and handling disinformation, protecting democratic institutions and building social cohesion.
For press enquiries please contact [email protected]. For all other enquiries please fill out the form below, and we will be in touch shortly.
By providing your information, you are agreeing that we can use it to contact you. For more information please see our privacy policy.
Democratic Global Parliament vote share detail:
Political Spectrum Categories | Seats Allocated | Vote Share |
Populist or Authoritarian Left | 37 | 4% |
Left Wing | 155 | 16% |
Centre-Left | 129 | 13% |
Centrist | 91 | 9% |
Centrist Authoritarian | 3 | 0% |
Centre-Right | 449 | 45% |
Right-Wing | 83 | 8% |
Populist or Authoritarian Right | 53 | 5% |
Central and Southern Asia (democracies) vote share detail:
Political Spectrum Categories | Seats Allocated | Vote Share |
Populist or Authoritarian Left | 0 | 0% |
Left Wing | 107 | 11% |
Centre-Left | 12 | 1% |
Centrist | 0 | 0% |
Centrist Authoritarian | 0 | 0% |
Centre-Right | 881 | 88% |
Right-Wing | 0 | 0% |
Populist or Authoritarian Right | 0 | 0% |
Eastern and South-Eastern Asia (democracies) vote share detail:
Political Spectrum Categories | Seats Allocated | Vote Share |
Populist or Authoritarian Left | 0 | 0% |
Left Wing | 0 | 0% |
Centre-Left | 251 | 25% |
Centrist | 0 | 0% |
Centrist Authoritarian | 0 | 0% |
Centre-Right | 185 | 19% |
Right-Wing | 564 | 56% |
Populist or Authoritarian Right | 0 | 0% |
Europe and North America vote share detail:
Political Spectrum Categories | Seats Allocated | Vote Share |
Populist or Authoritarian Left | 6 | 1% |
Left Wing | 129 | 13% |
Centre-Left | 245 | 25% |
Centrist | 52 | 5% |
Centrist Authoritarian | 0 | 0% |
Centre-Right | 490 | 49% |
Right-Wing | 7 | 1% |
Populist or Authoritarian Right | 62 | 6% |
Latin America and Caribbean vote share detail:
Political Spectrum Categories | Seats Allocated | Vote Share |
Populist or Authoritarian Left | 265 | 26% |
Left Wing | 515 | 51% |
Centre-Left | 7 | 1% |
Centrist | 30 | 3% |
Centrist Authoritarian | 0 | 0% |
Centre-Right | 48 | 5% |
Right-Wing | 59 | 6% |
Populist or Authoritarian Right | 76 | 8% |
North Africa and Western Asia (democracies) vote share detail:
Political Spectrum Categories | Seats Allocated | Vote Share |
Populist or Authoritarian Left | 18 | 2% |
Left Wing | 220 | 22% |
Centre-Left | 13 | 1% |
Centrist | 257 | 26% |
Centrist Authoritarian | 0 | 0% |
Centre-Right | 27 | 3% |
Right-Wing | 0 | 0% |
Populist or Authoritarian Right | 465 | 47% |
Oceania vote share detail:
Political Spectrum Categories | Seats Allocated | Vote Share |
Populist or Authoritarian Left | 16 | 2% |
Left Wing | 3 | 0% |
Centre-Left | 833 | 83% |
Centrist | 2 | 0% |
Centrist Authoritarian | 0 | 0% |
Centre-Right | 146 | 15% |
Right-Wing | 0 | 0% |
Populist or Authoritarian Right | 0 | 0% |
Sub-Saharan Africa vote share detail:
Political Spectrum Categories | Seats Allocated | Vote Share |
Populist or Authoritarian Left | 27 | 3% |
Left Wing | 151 | 15% |
Centre-Left | 221 | 22% |
Centrist | 372 | 37% |
Centrist Authoritarian | 14 | 1% |
Centre-Right | 131 | 13% |
Right-Wing | 9 | 1% |
Populist or Authoritarian Right | 75 | 8% |
Global Parliament vote share detail:
Political Alignment | Seats Allocated | Vote Share |
Populist or Authoritarian Left | 25 | 2% |
Left Wing | 106 | 11% |
Centre-Left | 88 | 9% |
Centrist | 62 | 6% |
Centrist Authoritarian | 2 | 0% |
Centre-Right | 307 | 31% |
Right-Wing | 57 | 6% |
Populist or Authoritarian Right | 36 | 4% |
Powerful Monarchic Systems | 14 | 1% |
Dictatorship | 303 | 30% |
Central and Southern Asia vote share detail:
Political Spectrum Categories | Seats Allocated | Vote Share |
Populist or Authoritarian Left | 0 | 0% |
Left Wing | 97 | 10% |
Centre-Left | 11 | 0% |
Centrist | 0 | 0% |
Centrist Authoritarian | 0 | 0% |
Centre-Right | 794 | 80% |
Right-Wing | 0 | 0% |
Populist or Authoritarian Right | 0 | 0% |
Powerful Monarchic System | 0 | 0% |
Dictatorship | 98 | 10% |
East and South-East Asia vote share detail:
Political Spectrum Categories | Seats Allocated | Vote Share |
Populist or Authoritarian Left | 0 | 0% |
Left Wing | 0 | 0% |
Centre-Left | 77 | 8% |
Centrist | 0 | 0% |
Centrist Authoritarian | 0 | 0% |
Centre-Right | 56 | 5% |
Right-Wing | 172 | 17% |
Populist or Authoritarian Right | 0 | 0% |
Powerful Monarchic System | 0 | 0% |
Dictatorship | 695 | 70% |
Europe and North America vote share detail:
Political Spectrum Categories | Seats Allocated | Vote Share |
Populist or Authoritarian Left | 5 | 1% |
Left Wing | 111 | 11% |
Centre-Left | 211 | 21% |
Centrist | 45 | 5% |
Centrist Authoritarian | 0 | 0% |
Centre-Right | 423 | 42% |
Right-Wing | 6 | 1% |
Populist or Authoritarian Right | 62 | 6% |
Powerful Monarchic Systems | 0 | 0% |
Dictatorship | 137 | 14% |
Latin America and Caribbean vote share detail:
Political Spectrum Categories | Seats Allocated | Vote Share |
Populist or Authoritarian Left | 247 | 25% |
Left Wing | 479 | 48% |
Centre-Left | 7 | 1% |
Centrist | 27 | 3% |
Centrist Authoritarian | 0 | 0% |
Centre-Right | 44 | 4% |
Right-Wing | 55 | 5% |
Populist or Authoritarian Right | 71 | 7% |
Powerful Monarchic Systems | 0 | 0% |
Dictatorship | 70 | 7% |
North Africa and Western Asia vote share detail:
Political Spectrum Categories | Seats Allocated | Vote Share |
Populist or Authoritarian Left | 7 | 1% |
Left Wing | 91 | 9% |
Centre-Left | 6 | 1% |
Centrist | 106 | 11% |
Centrist Authoritarian | 0 | 0% |
Centre-Right | 11 | 1% |
Right-Wing | 0 | 0% |
Populist or Authoritarian Right | 192 | 19% |
Powerful Monarchic Systems | 210 | 21% |
Dictatorship | 377 | 38% |
Oceania vote share detail:
Political Spectrum Categories | Seats Allocated | Vote Share |
Populist or Authoritarian Left | 17 | 2% |
Left Wing | 3 | 0% |
Centre-Left | 831 | 83% |
Centrist | 2 | 0% |
Centrist Authoritarian | 0 | 0% |
Centre-Right | 146 | 15% |
Right-Wing | 0 | 0% |
Populist or Authoritarian Right | 0 | 0% |
Powerful Monarchic Systems | 2 | 0% |
Dictatorship | 0 | 0% |
Sub-Saharan Africa vote share detail:
Political Spectrum Categories | Seats Allocated | Vote Share |
Populist or Authoritarian Left | 23 | 2% |
Left Wing | 126 | 13% |
Centre-Left | 184 | 18% |
Centrist | 310 | 31% |
Centrist Authoritarian | 12 | 1% |
Centre-Right | 110 | 11% |
Right-Wing | 7 | 1% |
Populist or Authoritarian Right | 63 | 6% |
Powerful Monarchic Systems | 1 | 0% |
Dictatorship | 164 | 17% |
The research and methodology behind the Global Parliament Index strive for objectivity and balance. Critiqued through an external informal peer review as well as the consultation of an internal advisory team, the Index comprises expert knowledge from a wide range of political perspectives in its assessment. The precise allocation of governments to each of the categories is a science as well as an art, and on occasion our team of experts have applied judgement where a governing Party has complex or multiple identities.
The study analyses the political alignment of the national rather than devolved or State governments in each nation around the world. The category allocated to each governing political party is based on a unique method which considers multiple factors including international and regional political affiliation, political and economic policies, international political engagement and a historical context of the party’s platform.
Arden’s Global Parliament Index uses recognised world regions established in the SDG framework of the United Nations. Arden’s political spectrum category is provided alongside other indices such as the Freedom House Democracy Index ratings in order to capture a well-rounded snapshot of the state of democracy across each state
The states excluded from this study include the following:
Afghanistan |
Azerbaijan |
Bahrain |
Belarus |
Brunei |
Burkina Faso |
Burundi |
Cambodia |
Cameroon |
Central African Republic |
Chad |
China |
Cuba |
Djibouti |
Egypt |
Equatorial Guinea |
Eritrea |
Eswatini |
Gabon |
Guinea |
Iran |
Kazakhstan |
Kuwait |
Kyrgyzstan |
Laos |
Mali |
Myanmar |
Nicaragua |
North Korea |
Niger |
Oman |
Qatar |
Republic of the Congo |
Russia |
Saudi Arabia |
Sudan |
Syria |
Tajikistan |
Tunisia |
Turkmenistan |
Vietnam |
Uzbekistan |
United Arab Emirates |
Venezuela |
Yemen |
All of the events listed below will take place in our lounge on Level 2 of the ECL (next to the entrance to the link bridge) unless stated otherwise in the event description.
Please note that as our lounge is inside the secure zone and you need a conference pass to attend these events.
By providing your information, you are agreeing that we can use it to contact you. For more information please see our privacy policy.
We have a limited number of two and four person tables available to reserve in our lounge. Our conference lounge is the most prestigious lounge at Labour Party Conference venue, and is the ideal space for your informal meetings.
If you would like to reserve a table in our lounge, please use the booking form below.
Please note that due to high demand for this space, bookings are limited to one table per person per day. If you would like to make additional reservations please contact your account manager or email [email protected]
By providing your information, you are agreeing that we can use it to contact you. For more information please see our privacy policy.
We have a limited number of two and four person tables available to reserve in our lounge. Our conference lounge is the most prestigious lounge at Labour Party Conference venue, and is the ideal space for your informal meetings.
Please note that due to high demand for this space, bookings are limited to one table per person per day. If you would like to make additional reservations please contact your account manager or email [email protected]
By providing your information, you are agreeing that we can use it to contact you. For more information please see our privacy policy.